Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LOUSCHER, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by MOSS, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Predicting Dangerous behavior in a Penitentiary Using the Megargee Typology

P. KENT LOUSCHER

Psychiatric Research Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison

RAY E. HOSFORD

University of California Santa Barbara

C. SCOTT MOSS

Federal Penitentiary, Lompoc, California

This study investigates the efficacy of the Megargee typology system for classifying inmates in a penitentiary setting and for predicting institutional adjustment during incarceration. A random sample of 520 inmates from a penitentiary population of 1074 are classified into the typology groups according to procedures developed by Megargee, et al. (1977). A variety of demographic and criminal history variables are analyzed to determine subject characteristics for each of the ten typology groups. Institutional adjustment is assessed by data on inmate behavior routinely collected and recorded on each inmate by prison staff.

Analysis of the data shows that: (1) the Megargee typology could classify inmates into ten groups not proportionately different than those in a medium-security institution, (2) the groups did not differ significantly from one another on age, race, or offense type, and (3) contrary to predictions by Megargee et al. for a medium-security prison, the typology groupings are not effective in predicting which inmates would be antisocial or aggressive in a penitentiary setting.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 10, No. 3, 269-284 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854883010003004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
G. Rossi and H. Sloore
Cross-Cultural Reliability and Generality of the Megargee Offender Classification System
Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2008; 35(6): 725 - 740.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
H. E. HUTTON and M. H. MINER
The Validation of the Megargee-Bohn Typology in African American and Caucasian Forensic Psychiatric Patients
Criminal Justice and Behavior, September 1, 1995; 22(3): 233 - 245.
[Abstract]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
W. N. WELSH and A. GORDON
Cognitive Mediators of Aggression: Test of a Causal Model
Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 1991; 18(2): 125 - 145.
[Abstract]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
D. A. ANDREWS, J. BONTA, and R. D. HOGE
Classification for Effective Rehabilitation: Rediscovering Psychology
Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 1990; 17(1): 19 - 52.
[Abstract]


Home page
The Prison JournalHome page
M. S. Vaughn and A. D. Sapp
Less Than Utopian: Sex Offender Treatment in a Milieu of Power Struggles, Status Positioning, And Inmate Manipulation in State Correctional Institutions
The Prison Journal, October 1, 1989; 69(2): 73 - 89.
[PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
K. N. WRIGHT
The Relationship of Risk, Needs, and Personality Classification Systems and Prison Adjustment
Criminal Justice and Behavior, December 1, 1988; 15(4): 454 - 471.
[Abstract]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
L. D. ZAGER
The MMPI-Based Criminal Classification System: A Review, Current Status, and Future Directions
Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 1988; 15(1): 39 - 57.
[Abstract]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
R. J. CAREY, J. P. GARSKE, and J. GINSBERG
The Prediction of Adjustment to Prison by Means of an MMPI-Based Classification System
Criminal Justice and Behavior, December 1, 1986; 13(4): 347 - 365.
[Abstract]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
E. I. MEGARGEE
A Psychometric Study of Incarcerated Presidential Threateners
Criminal Justice and Behavior, September 1, 1986; 13(3): 243 - 260.
[Abstract]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
T. D. KENNEDY
Trends in Inmate Classification: A Status Report of Two Computerized Psychometric Approaches
Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 1986; 13(2): 165 - 184.
[Abstract]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
L. L. MOTIUK, J. BONTA, and D. A. ANDREWS
Classification in Correctional Halfway Houses: The Relative and Incremental Predictive Criterion Validities of the Megargee-MMPI and LSI Systems
Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 1986; 13(1): 33 - 46.
[Abstract]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
C. Veneziano and L. Veneziano
Classification of Adolescent Offenders with the MMPI: An Extension and Cross-Validation of the Megargee Typology
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, March 1, 1986; 30(1): 11 - 23.
[Abstract]