Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WALKEY, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by GILMOUR, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Relationship between Interpersonal Distance and Violence in Imprisoned Offenders

FRANK H. WALKEY

Victoria University of Wellington

D. ROSS GILMOUR

Victoria University of Wellington

A 12-month follow-up of 73 prison inmates who had completed a video measure of preferred Interpersonal Distance (IPD) showed that those who had been involved in fights during the follow-up period had significantly higher IPD scores. Further classification into subgroups identified a very high IPD group who had a previous record of violence and who were the aggressors in fights in prison, and a very low IPD group who had no record of violence and were not involved in fights except as victims. A discriminant function analysis indicated that IPD score was the variable which best predicted fighting in prison. This analysis derived a function from which it was possible to predict fighting behavior with a 71% rate of success.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 11, No. 3, 331-340 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854884011003005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
S. A. French and P. Gendreau
Reducing Prison Misconducts: What Works!
Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2006; 33(2): 185 - 218.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
A. R. Gover, D. L. Mackenzie, and G. S. Armstrong
Importation and Deprivation Explanations of Juveniles' Adjustment to Correctional Facilities
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, August 1, 2000; 44(4): 450 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Prison JournalHome page
W. G. Archambeault and C. R. Fenwick
A Comparative Analysis of Culture, Safety, and Organizational Management Factors in Japanese and U.S. Prisons
The Prison Journal, January 1, 1988; 68(1): 3 - 23.
[PDF]