This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by AGNEW, R. Articles by PETERS, A. A. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Techniques of Neutralization

An Analysis of Predisposing and Situational Factors

Emory University

ARDITH A. R. PETERS

Atlanta Public Safety Department

In order for neutralization to result in deviance, persons must (1) accept a technique of neutralization and (2) believe that they are in a situation in which the technique is applicable. Prior studies have confounded these two factors or ignored one of them. Employing a sample of college students, we examine the effect of both factors on cheating and shoplifting. Our central hypothesis is that acceptance of neutralizations will lead to deviance only when people believe that they are in situations in which the neutralizations apply. This hypothesis was supported for both forms of deviance. The consideration of both factors leads to an increase in the explanatory power of neutralization theory, allows us to better predict when the acceptance of neutralizations will lead to deviance, and sheds light on the mixed results of past neutralization research.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 13, No. 1, 81-97 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854886013001005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Agnew Storylines As a Neglected Cause of Crime Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, May 1, 2006; 43(2): 119 - 147. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. F. Mills, D. G. Kroner, and A. E. Forth Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA): Development, Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity Assessment, September 1, 2002; 9(3): 240 - 253. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. HINDUJA Correlates of Internet Software Piracy Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, November 1, 2001; 17(4): 369 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. BYERS, B. W. CRIDER, and G. K. BIGGERS Bias Crime Motivation: A Study of Hate Crime and Offender Neutralization Techniques Used Against the Amish Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, February 1, 1999; 15(1): 78 - 96. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. J. McShane, J. Lawless, and B. A. Noonan Personal Meaning in the Lives of a Shoplifting Population Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, September 1, 1991; 35(3): 190 - 204. [Abstract]

				R. AGNEW The Origins of Delinquent Events: An Examination of Offender Accounts Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, August 1, 1990; 27(3): 267 - 294. [Abstract] [PDF]