Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROMAN, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by MITCHELL, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evaluating MMPI Validity in a Forensic Psychiatric Population

Distinguishing between Malingering and Genuine Psychopathology

DEBORAH D. ROMAN

Baylor University

MICHAEL R. TULEY

Baylor University

MICHAEL R. VILLANUEVA

Baylor University

WILLIAM E. MITCHELL

Baylor University

The MMPI scores of 353 forensic psychiatric patients were examined to determine the validity scale characteristics of this population. Frequency distributions are provided for L, F, K, F-K, and O-S. These findings suggest that traditional cutoffs for these scales are of questionable use in determining the validity of MMPI scores for this population. It is suggested that elevations on validity measures in this population may be due to characterological features, substance abuse, and the presence of acute psychopathology in addition to deliberate efforts to deceive. The validity and clinical scale characteristics of a small group of identified malingerers (n = 10) were compared to those of psychotic patients and were found to be distinctly different. Malingerers scored significantly higher on all "fake bad" validity measures (F, F-K, and O-S) and all clinical scales except 5 and 9, and lower on L and K. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 17, No. 2, 186-198 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854890017002003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
W. V. Pelfrey Jr
The Relationship Between Malingerers' Intelligence and MMPI-2 Knowledge and Their Ability to Avoid Detection
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, December 1, 2004; 48(6): 649 - 663.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
J. L. McNulty, J. D. Forbey, J. R. Graham, Y. S. Ben-Porath, M. S. Black, S. V. Anderson, and A. K. Burlew
MMPI-2 Validity Scale Characteristics in a Correctional Sample
Assessment, September 1, 2003; 10(3): 288 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
J. P. LePagea, N. L. Mogge, and W. R. Sharpe Jr.
Validity Rates of the MMPI-2 and PAI in a Rural Inpatient Psychiatric Facility
Assessment, March 1, 2001; 8(1): 67 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
R. W. GALLAGHER, Y. S. BEN-PORATH, and S. BRIGGS
Inmate Views About the Purpose and Use of the MMPI-2 at the Time of Correctional Intake
Criminal Justice and Behavior, September 1, 1997; 24(3): 360 - 369.
[Abstract]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
P. K. FAUTECK
Detecting the Malingering of Psychosis in Offenders:: No Easy Solutions
Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 1995; 22(1): 3 - 18.
[Abstract]