This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by STALANS, L. J. Articles by LURIGIO, A. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Lay and Professionals' Beliefs about Crime and Criminal Sentencing

A Need for Theory, Perhaps Schema Theory

University of Illinois at Chicago

ARTHUR J. LURIGIO

Loyola University of Chicago

A conceptual framework, schema theory, is presented to understand and compare lay and professionals' beliefs about crime and evaluations of the criminal justice system. Questionnaires were administered to a sample of probation officers (N = 145) and laypersons (N = 179) to examine differences between laypersons and probation officers' beliefs about burglary characteristics and evaluations of judicial sentencing. As expected from schema theory, laypersons were significantly more likely than probation officers to report that the burglar carried a weapon, had a longer adult and juvenile record, and was likely to commit physical harm in the future. In their evaluations of criminal sentencing, probation officers relied on their perception of the congruency between their own sentencing preferences and their impressions of judicial sentencing. Directions for future research are discussed.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 17, No. 3, 333-349 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854890017003007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Finn and L. J. Stalans Police Handling of the Mentally Ill in Domestic Violence Situations Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2002; 29(3): 278 - 307. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. LEIBER and A. C. WOODRICK Religious Beliefs, Attributional Styles, and Adherence to Correctional Orientations Criminal Justice and Behavior, December 1, 1997; 24(4): 495 - 511. [Abstract]