Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FEAZELL, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by MURRAY, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Validity and Utility Of Lanyon's Psychological Screening Inventory in a Youth Services Agency Sample

DAVID M. FEAZELL

University of Miami

HERBERT C. QUAY

University of Miami

EDWARD J. MURRAY

University of Miami

The validity and utility of the Psychological Screening Inventory (PSI) was evaluated with a group of 351 male and 185 female adolescents in a juvenile court related agency. In addition, 174 noncourt controls were studied. Court records and psychological evaluations were used to obtain behavioral measures and ratings on the Life History Checklist. The PSI discriminated major emotional problems, offenses, peer relations, and cooperativeness and it was related to several measures of the Life History Checklist. However, the mean differences and correlations were small and of little practical use. Classification accuracy was poor. In a multitrait-multimethod analysis, the PSI showed poor discriminant validity from unrelated measures and method variance. Good discriminant validity from demographic variables was found. It was concluded that there are serious limitations in using the PSI in a juvenile population.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 18, No. 2, 166-179 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854891018002005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?