This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by KOSS, M. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Measurement of Rape Victimization in Crime Surveys

University of Arizona

Although the past 20 years have seen changes in the statutory definition of rape, its investigation, and its adjudication, for the bulk of this period those responsible for the measurement of rape victimization in national and international crime surveys have clung to inadequate rape screening. Because the resultant victimization estimates failed to capture accurately the incidence of rape, independent researchers tried to fill the data vacuum, a situation that has precluded a cumulative database and promoted an antirape backlash. Flawed federal data ill-serve policy needs and fuel a negative recovery climate for victims. This article argues that it is time for U.S. victimization statistics to measure rape with the same precision accorded other crimes and to communicate more openly to the public the limitations of crime survey methodology to detect intimate violence including rape.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 1, 55-69 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854896023001005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. S. Fisher The Effects of Survey Question Wording on Rape Estimates: Evidence From a Quasi-Experimental Design Violence Against Women, February 1, 2009; 15(2): 133 - 147. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Crown and L. J. Roberts Against their will: Young women's nonagentic sexual experiences Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2007; 24(3): 385 - 405. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. L. Sample An Examination of the Degree to Which Sex Offenders Kill Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 2006; 31(3): 230 - 250. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. L. Sample and T. M. Bray Are Sex Offenders Different? An Examination of Rearrest Patterns Criminal Justice Policy Review, March 1, 2006; 17(1): 83 - 102. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. S. Fisher, F. T. Cullen, and L. E. Daigle The Discovery of Acquaintance Rape: The Salience of Methodological Innovation and Rigor J Interpers Violence, April 1, 2005; 20(4): 493 - 500. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. L. Banyard, E. G. Plante, E. S. Cohn, C. Moorhead, S. Ward, and W. Walsh Revisiting Unwanted Sexual Experiences on Campus: A 12-Year Follow-Up Violence Against Women, April 1, 2005; 11(4): 426 - 446. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. G. Kilpatrick What Is Violence Against Women: Defining and Measuring the Problem J Interpers Violence, November 1, 2004; 19(11): 1209 - 1234. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. J. Schneider Victimological Developments in the World during the Past Three Decades (I): A Study of Comparative Victimology Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, August 1, 2001; 45(4): 449 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. B. RUBACK and K. S. MENARD Rural-Urban Differences in Sexual Victimization and Reporting: Analyses Using UCR and Crisis Center Data Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2001; 28(2): 131 - 155. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. D. SCHWARTZ Methodological Issues in the Use of Survey Data for Measuring and Characterizing Violence Against Women Violence Against Women, August 1, 2000; 6(8): 815 - 838. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. D. Killworth, C. McCarty, H. R. Bernard, G. A. Shelley, and E. C. Johnsen Estimation of Seroprevalence, Rape, and Homelessness in the United States Using a Social Network Approach Eval Rev, April 1, 1998; 22(2): 289 - 308. [Abstract] [PDF]