Criminal Justice and Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HENNING, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by FRUEH, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 4, 523-541 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854896023004001

Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Incarcerated Offenders

An Evaluation of the Vermont Department of Corrections' Cognitive Self-Change Program

KRIS R. HENNING

University of Memphis

B. CHRISTOPHER FRUEH

Ralph H.Johnson Veteran's Administration Medical Center Medical University of South Carolina

Recidivism rates were compared in two groups of male offenders from a medium-security state prison. Offenders in the first group (n = 55) voluntarily participated in a cognitive-behavioral treatment program that addressed "thinking errors" related to criminal behavior. A second group of offenders (n = 141) from the same facility, who did not participate in the treatment program, served as a comparison group. A significant difference in recidivism was observed between the groups, with 50% of the offenders from the treatment group recidivating, compared to 70.8% of the comparison group. More favorable results for the program were observed when these data were subjected to survival analyses and implications. Practical limitations of the present study for the treatment of a general population of incarcerated offenders are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
K. K. Parhar, J. S. Wormith, D. M. Derkzen, and A. M. Beauregard
Offender Coercion in Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness
Criminal Justice and Behavior, September 1, 2008; 35(9): 1109 - 1135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
D. B. Wilson, L. A. Bouffard, and D. L. Mackenzie
A Quantitative Review of Structured, Group-Oriented, Cognitive-Behavioral Programs for Offenders
Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2005; 32(2): 172 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
P. van Voorhis, L. M. Spruance, P. N. Ritchey, S. J. Listwan, and R. Seabrook
The Georgia Cognitive Skills Experiment: A Replication of Reasoning and Rehabilitation
Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2004; 31(3): 282 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
C. Dowden, D. Antonowicz, and D. A. Andrews
The Effectiveness of Relapse Prevention with Offenders: A Meta-Analysis
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, October 1, 2003; 47(5): 516 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
R. J. McGrath, G. Cumming, J. A. Livingston, and S. E. Hoke
Outcome of a Treatment Program for Adult Sex Offenders: From Prison to Community
J Interpers Violence, January 1, 2003; 18(1): 3 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
M. K. Stohr, C. Hemmens, B. Shapiro, B. Chambers, and L. Kelley
Comparing Inmate Perceptions of Two Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Programs
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, December 1, 2002; 46(6): 699 - 714.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
M. Killias, M. F. Aebi, and D. Ribeaud
Learning Through Controlled Experiments: Community Service and Heroin Prescription in Switzerland
Crime Delinquency, April 1, 2000; 46(2): 233 - 251.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
A. L. BARO
Effects of a Cognitive Restructuring Program on Inmate Institutional Behavior
Criminal Justice and Behavior, December 1, 1999; 26(4): 466 - 484.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
D. J. SIMOURD and J. VAN DE VEN
Assessment of Criminal Attitudes: Criterion-Related Validity of the Criminal Sentiments Scale-Modified and Pride in Delinquency Scale
Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 1999; 26(1): 90 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
R. J. McGRATH, S. E. HOKE, and J. E. VOJTISEK
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Sex Offenders: A Treatment Comparison and Long-Term Follow-Up Study
Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 1998; 25(2): 203 - 225.
[Abstract]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
F. T. Cullen, P. Gendreau, G. R. Jarjoura, and J. P. Wright
Crime and the Bell Curve: Lessons from Intelligent Criminology
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 1997; 43(4): 387 - 411.
[Abstract]