Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FINN, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by STALANS, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Influence of Gender and Mental State on Police Decisions in Domestic Assault Cases

MARY A. FINN

Georgia State University

LORETTA J. STALANS

Loyola University

Research findings on gender biases in police decision making are mixed and have not directly examined how assailants' gender affects officers' interpretation of situational cues or their decisions. Using hypothetical scripts and experimental manipulation, this study examined how disputants' gender and mental state affected 130 officers' inferences about dangerousness, responsibility, credibility, and control and, ultimately, their decisions to arrest or refer for involuntary civil commitment in domestic assault cases. Officers inferred that male victims of domestic assault had more control over their actions and were more responsible than female victims. Mentally ill assailants were viewed as more dangerous and less in control of their actions than normal assailants. Gender influenced the arrest decision through officers' assessments of disputants' credibility and responsibility. Female mentally ill assailants were more likely than males to be referred for involuntary civil commitment. The findings suggest that both gender and mental state affect officers' inferences and decisions in domestic assault cases.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 2, 157-176 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854897024002002
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
M. A. Finn, B. S. Blackwell, L. J. Stalans, S. Studdard, and L. Dugan
Dual Arrest Decisions in Domestic Violence Cases: The Influence of Departmental Policies
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2004; 50(4): 565 - 589.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
M. A. Finn and L. J. Stalans
Police Handling of the Mentally Ill in Domestic Violence Situations
Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2002; 29(3): 278 - 307.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
O. W. BARNETT
Why Battered Women Do Not Leave, Part 1: External Inhibiting Factors Within Society
Trauma Violence Abuse, October 1, 2000; 1(4): 343 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]