Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by REED, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by ROSE, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Doing What Simple Simon Says?

Estimating the Underlying Causal Structures of Delinquent Associations, Attitudes, and Serious Theft

MARK D. REED

Georgia State University

DINA R. ROSE

Florida State University

From within a social learning framework, the authors test the relative contributions of socialization, group pressure, social selection, and rationalization processes in explaining the relationships between peer-group associations, attitudes, and serious theft. Estimating a nonrecursive model, the authors argue that serious theft is as likely to affect delinquent associations and attitudes as associations and attitudes are to affect serious theft. The authors use panel data over three time periods from the National Youth Survey (NYS) to estimate simultaneously the influences of each social process over time. In addition, the authors estimate a measurement model to correct for the potential biasing effects of correlated measurement error. Estimation of the nonrecursive model reveals that the socialization effects of peers are negligible and insignificant. The group pressure effects are of relatively equal importance in comparison to the social selection effects. However, the group pressure effects are substantially smaller in magnitude compared to those commonly reported in recursive studies.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 2, 240-274 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854898025002006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Journal of CriminologyHome page
F. M. Weerman and C. C. J. H. Bijleveld
Birds of Different Feathers: School Networks of Serious Delinquent, Minor Delinquent and Non-delinquent Boys and Girls
European Journal of Criminology, October 1, 2007; 4(4): 357 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
E. A. Stewart, R. L. Simons, R. D. Conger, and L. V. Scaramella
Beyond the Interactional Relationship between Delinquency and Parenting Practices: The Contribution of Legal Sanctions
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 2002; 39(1): 36 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
R. LOTZ and L. LEE
Sociability, School Experience, and Delinquency
Youth Society, December 1, 1999; 31(2): 199 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]