Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on IACFP jobs

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANGLIN, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by TURNER, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime

An Evaluation of Five Programs

M. DOUGLAS ANGLIN

UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center

DOUGLAS LONGSHORE

UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center RAND Drug Policy Research Center

SUSAN TURNER

RAND Drug Policy Research Center

In response to the increasing numbers of criminal offenders involved with drugs, the criminal justice system has sought more effective means of intervening with these offenders. One intervention approach is Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC), an offender management model that has been implemented in various forms since the early 1970s. TASC facilitates treatment for drug-using offenders as part of an overall strategy to control drug use and associated criminal behaviors. This article reviews the evolution of TASC and reports findings from an evaluation of five TASC programs. The evaluation, experimental at two sites and quasi-experimental at three, found favorable effects of TASC programs on service delivery and offenders' drug use. Findings on criminal recidivism were mixed and difficult to interpret. This article concludes with specific recommendations for improving TASC and similar programs within the criminal justice system.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 2, 168-195 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854899026002002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
T. D. Warner and J. H. Kramer
Closing the Revolving Door?: Substance Abuse Treatment as an Alternative to Traditional Sentencing for Drug-Dependent Offenders
Criminal Justice and Behavior, January 1, 2009; 36(1): 89 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
M. Prendergast, D. Huang, and Y.-I. Hser
Patterns of Crime and Drug Use Trajectories in Relation to Treatment Initiation and 5-Year Outcomes: An Application of Growth Mixture Modeling Across Three Data Sets
Eval Rev, February 1, 2008; 32(1): 59 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
J. Brocato and E. F. Wagner
Predictors of Retention in an Alternative-To-Prison Substance Abuse Treatment Program
Criminal Justice and Behavior, January 1, 2008; 35(1): 99 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
Y.-I. Hser, D. Longshore, and M. D. Anglin
The Life Course Perspective on Drug Use: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Drug Use Trajectories
Eval Rev, December 1, 2007; 31(6): 515 - 547.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
J. R. Hepburn and A. N. Harvey
The Effect of the Threat of Legal Sanction on Program Retention and Completion: Is That Why They Stay in Drug Court?
Crime Delinquency, April 1, 2007; 53(2): 255 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
J. R. Hepburn
Recidivism Among Drug Offenders Following Exposure to Treatment
Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 2005; 16(2): 237 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
D. Longshore, S. Turner, and T. Fain
Effects of Case Management on Parolee Misconduct: The Bay Area Services Network
Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2005; 32(2): 205 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
D. Longshore, E. Chang, S.-c. Hsieh, and N. Messina
Self-Control and Social Bonds: A Combined Control Perspective on Deviance
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2004; 50(4): 542 - 564.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
Y.-I. Hser, C. Teruya, E. A. Evans, D. Longshore, C. Grella, and D. Farabee
Treating Drug-Abusing Offenders: Initial Findings from a Five-County Study on the Impact of California's Proposition 36 on the Treatment System and Patient Outcomes
Eval Rev, October 1, 2003; 27(5): 479 - 505.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Adolescent ResearchHome page
D. Farabee, H. Shen, Y.-I. Hser, C. E. Grella, and M. D. Anglin
The Effect of Drug Treatment on Criminal Behavior among Adolescents in DATOS-A
Journal of Adolescent Research, November 1, 2001; 16(6): 679 - 696.
[Abstract] [PDF]