This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by CUNNINGHAM, M. D. Articles by VIGEN, M. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Without Appointed Counsel in Capital Postconviction Proceedings

The Self-Representation Competency of Mississippi Death Row Inmates

Abilene, Texas

MARK P. VIGEN

Shreveport, Louisiana

Debate continues about whether the higher standard of reliability of death penalty proceedings extends to providing appointed counsel to death row prisoners in state postconviction (i.e., habeas corpus or collateral relief) proceedings. To better inform this discussion, 44 of 52 death row inmates in Mississippi, a state that has not in the past typically provided appointed counsel in state postconviction litigation, were evaluated regarding their underlying abilities, relevant aptitudes, specific legal knowledge, and psychological stability to competently represent themselves in collateral relief proceedings. The Mississippi death row inmates exhibited a pattern of broad deficits in requisite verbal intellectual ability, reading comprehension, legal aptitude, knowledge specific to postconviction practice, and psychological well-being. These deficits raise grave concerns regarding the self-representation competency of Mississippi death row prisoners. These findings may also be applicable to other jurisdictions and contexts.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?