|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Self-Control, Accidents, and Crime
MARIANNE JUNGER
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Criminality and Law Enforcement
RICHARD E. TREMBLAY
University of Montreal
According to self-control theory, crime and accident involvement are positively related. Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) argued that this relation is spurious and results from the fact that both accidents and crime are the result of a lack of self-control. In particular, they argued that a positive relation is supportive of their theory and cannot be explained by competing theories, such as strain or cultural deviance theory. This study explored two questions: (a) Is there a relation between crime and accidents? (b) Is there support for the spuriousness thesis, that is, can the relation between crime and accident involvement be accounted for by a measure of self-control or by a measure of social control? The answer to both questions was largely affirmative. There was a relatively strong positive relation between crime and accidents, with delinquents more involved than nondelinquents in accidents. The analysis also showed that, although measures of self-control and social control were related to delinquency and to accident involvement, the relation between crime and accidents became weaker when these measures were taken into account, but it did not disappear. Thus, the spuriousness thesis was partially supported.
Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 4,
485-501 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854899026004005

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J Mytton, E Towner, M Brussoni, and S Gray
Unintentional injuries in school-aged children and adolescents: lessons from a systematic review of cohort studies
Inj. Prev.,
April 1, 2009;
15(2):
111 - 124.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. DeLisi and M. G. Vaughn
The Gottfredson-Hirschi Critiques Revisited: Reconciling Self-Control Theory, Criminal Careers, and Career Criminals
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol,
October 1, 2008;
52(5):
520 - 537.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. DeLisi, A. Hochstetler, G. E. Higgins, K. M. Beaver, and C. M. Graeve
Toward a General Theory of Criminal Justice: Low Self-Control and Offender Noncompliance
Criminal Justice Review,
June 1, 2008;
33(2):
141 - 158.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. E. Higgins, B. D. Fell, and A. L. Wilson
Low Self-Control and Social Learning in Understanding Students' Intentions to Pirate Movies in the United States
Social Science Computer Review,
August 1, 2007;
25(3):
339 - 357.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. T. Vazsonyi and J. M. Crosswhite
A Test of Gottfredson and Hirschi'S General Theory of Crime in African American Adolescents
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,
November 1, 2004;
41(4):
407 - 432.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Perrone, C. J. Sullivan, T. C. Pratt, and S. Margaryan
Parental Efficacy, Self-Control, and Delinquency: a Test of a General Theory of Crime on a Nationally Representative Sample of Youth
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol,
June 1, 2004;
48(3):
298 - 312.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Tittle, D. A. Ward, and H. G. Grasmick
Gender, Age, and Crime/Deviance: A Challenge to Self-Control Theory
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,
November 1, 2003;
40(4):
426 - 453.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. DeLisi
It's all in the Record: Assessing Self-Control Theory with an Offender Sample
Criminal Justice Review,
May 1, 2001;
26(1):
1 - 16.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|