This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by WELSH, B. C. Articles by FARRINGTON, D. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Correctional Intervention Programs and Cost-Benefit Analysis

University of Massachusetts at Lowell

DAVID P. FARRINGTON

University of Cambridge

A program is economically efficient if its monetary benefits outweigh its monetary costs. Discussions of the economic efficiency of correctional intervention and other crime and offender prevention programs can be very persuasive and have gained wide appeal in political, policy, and academic settings. However, little is known about the economic efficiency of crime prevention strategies. This article examines the contribution, both methodological and empirical, of cost-benefit analyses of correctional intervention programs designed to reduce reoffending in the community. A review of the literature revealed only seven published studies that have presented information on monetary costs and benefits. Future cost-benefit research on correctional intervention should be concerned with standardizing the measurement of costs and benefits, especially in well-designed studies comparing experimental and control groups with before and after measures of offending. A standard list of monetary costs and benefits that should be measured in all studies is needed.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 27, No. 1, 115-133 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854800027001007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Duggan Why are programmes for offenders with personality disorder not informed by the relevant scientific findings? Phil Trans R Soc B, August 12, 2008; 363(1503): 2599 - 2612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Caldwell, M. Vitacco, and G. J. Van Rybroek Are Violent Delinquents Worth Treating? A Cost-Benefit Analysis Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, May 1, 2006; 43(2): 148 - 168. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. B. Swaray, R. Bowles, and R. Pradiptyo The Application of Economic Analysis to Criminal Justice Interventions: A Review of the Literature Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 2005; 16(2): 141 - 163. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. McDougall, M. A. Cohen, R. Swaray, and A. Perry The Costs and Benefits of Sentencing: A Systematic Review The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2003; 587(1): 160 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. M. Fass and C.-R. Pi Getting Tough on Juvenile Crime: An Analysis of Costs and Benefits Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, November 1, 2002; 39(4): 363 - 399. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. P. FARRINGTON, A. PETROSINO, and B. C. WELSH Systematic Reviews and Cost-Benefit Analyses of Correctional Interventions The Prison Journal, September 1, 2001; 81(3): 339 - 359. [Abstract] [PDF]