Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kropp, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lyon, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Risk Assessment of Stalkers

Some Problems and Possible Solutions

P. Randall Kropp

British Columbia Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission

Stephen D. Hart

Simon Fraser University

David R. Lyon

Simon Fraser University

Risk assessment of stalkers is difficult due to the diversity of stalking-related behaviors and the lack of research. The authors discuss three problems. First, stalking is a form of targeted violence, that is, violence directed at specific people known to the perpetrator. Second, stalking may include acts that are implicitly or indirectly threatening. Third, stalking can persist for many years, even decades. In contrast, most research on violence risk assessment ignores the relationship between victim and perpetrator, defines violence solely in terms of physical harm, and tracks perpetrators for limited time periods. The authors conclude that these problems make it impossible to rely on actuarial approaches when assessing risk for stalking at the present time, although it is possible to use structured professional judgment. They discuss some basic principles that can be used to guide stalking risk assessment within the framework of structured professional judgment.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 5, 590-616 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/009385402236734


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
P. E. Mullen, R. Mackenzie, J. R. P. Ogloff, M. Pathe, T. McEwan, and R. Purcell
Assessing and Managing the Risks in the Stalking Situation
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2006; 34(4): 439 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
D. M. Schwartz-Watts
Commentary: Stalking Risk Profile
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2006; 34(4): 455 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
P. Kinkade, R. Burns, and A. I. Fuentes
Criminalizing Attractions: Perceptions of Stalking and the Stalker
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 2005; 51(1): 3 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]