This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Webster, C. D. Articles by Bloom, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Transcending the Actuarial Versus Clinical Polemic in Assessing Risk for Violence

St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton

Stephen J. Hucker

McMaster University

Hy Bloom

University of Toronto

Much energy has been expended over recent years in debating the relative merits of actuarial versus clinical approaches to violence risk prediction. Although it has gradually become apparent that scores based on more or less static factors obtainable from the record do indeed associate with outcome violence over years of follow-up, there is no reason to suppose that, at least potentially, dynamic variables do not hold as much or more promise when it comes to projections over weeks or months. Clinicians involved in release decision-making might wish to consider the following, in order of importance: (a) the legal framework within which the decision is being made, (b) the thoroughness with which scientific methods have been applied to the particular case at issue, (c) the precision of the individualized statement of violence risk being offered, (d) the steps which could be taken to reduce that risk, and (e) if available, the individual's violence risk assessment score in relation to already amassed pertinent statistical data.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 5, 659-665 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/009385402236736


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. P.B. Lodewijks, T. A.H. Doreleijers, and C. De Ruiter Savry Risk Assessment in Violent Dutch Adolescents: Relation to Sentencing and Recidivism Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2008; 35(6): 696 - 709. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D.A. Louw, C.C. Strydom, and K.G.F. Esterhuyse Prediction of violent behaviour: Professionals' appraisal JCriminology and Criminal Justice, November 1, 2005; 5(4): 379 - 406. [Abstract] [PDF]