This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Feldman-Summers, S. Articles by Lindner, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Perceptions of Victims and Defendants in Criminal Assault Cases

University of Washington

Karen Lindner

University of Washington

An experiment was conducted to ascertain the manner in which male and female subjects perceive the victim and the defendant involved in criminal assault. Characteristics of the victim, type of crime committed, and sex of the subject were systematically varied. The experiment, therefore, took the form of a 5 (Married Woman/Single, Virgin/Single, Nonvirgin/Divorced Woman/Prostitute) X 3 (Rape/ Attempted Rape/Physical Assault) X 2 (Male Subjects/Female Subjects) factorial design. The findings indicate that as the respectability of the victim decreases, her perceived responsibility for the rape increases. Furthermore, as the victim's respectability declines, the perceived impact of the crime on the victim decreases. In addition, significant sex differences (female > males) emerged in conjunction with the length of jail sentence recommended for the defendant, perceived psychological impact of the crime on the victim, the seriousness of the crime, and the perceived guilt of the defendant. The results are interpreted within a balance theory framework, and the implications of the research for legal procedures are discussed.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 3, No. 2, 135-150 (1976)
DOI: 10.1177/009385487600300203


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Worrall, J. W. Ross, and E. S. McCord Modeling Prosecutors' Charging Decisions in Domestic Violence Cases Crime Delinquency, July 1, 2006; 52(3): 472 - 503. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. K. Daugherty and J. A. Esper Victim Characteristics and Attributions of Blame in Male Rape Traumatology, January 1, 1998; 4(2): 29 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Foley, C. Evancic, K. Karnik, J. King, and A. Parks Date Rape: Effects of Race of Assailant and Victim and Gender of Subjects on Perceptions Journal of Black Psychology, February 1, 1995; 21(1): 6 - 18. [Abstract]

				R. L. Curtis Jr. and W. A. Reese II Framed Attributions and Shaped Accounts: A Study of Dispositional Process in Juvenile Justice Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 1994; 19(2): 244 - 270. [Abstract]

				L. Lewis and K. K.P. Johnson Effect of Dress, Cosmetics, Sex of Subject, and Causal Inference on Attribution of Victim Responsibility1 Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, September 1, 1989; 8(1): 22 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. N. MACRAE and J. W. SHEPHERD Sex Differences in the Perception of Rape Victims J Interpers Violence, September 1, 1989; 4(3): 278 - 288. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Polk Rape Reform and Criminal Justice Processing Crime Delinquency, April 1, 1985; 31(2): 191 - 205. [Abstract]

				B. Thornton and R. M. Ryckman The Influence of a Rape Victim's Physical Attractiveness on Observers' Attributions of Responsibility Human Relations, June 1, 1983; 36(6): 549 - 561. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Galvin and K. Polk Nccd Research Review : Attrition in Case Processing Is Rape Unique? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, January 1, 1983; 20(1): 126 - 154. [Abstract]

				K. L'Armand and A. Pepitone Judgments of Rape: A Study of Victim-Rapist Relationship and Victim Sexual History Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1982; 8(1): 134 - 139. [Abstract]

				K. L'Armand, A. Pepitone, and T. E. Shanmugam Attitudes toward Rape: A Comparison of the Role of Chastity in India and the United States Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 1981; 12(3): 284 - 303. [Abstract]

				S. Feldman-Summers and G. C. Palmer Rape as Viewed By Judges, Prosecutors, and Police Officers Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 1980; 7(1): 19 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Cann, L. G. Calhoun, and J. W. Selby Attributing Responsibility to the Victim of Rape: Influence of Information Regarding Past Sexual Experience Human Relations, January 1, 1979; 32(1): 57 - 67. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. W. Selby, L. G. Calhoun, and T. A. Brock Sex Differences in the Social Perception of Rape Victims Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 1977; 3(3): 412 - 415. [Abstract] [PDF]