This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bourgon, G. Articles by Armstrong, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Transferring the Principles of Effective Treatment into a "Real World" Prison Setting

Corrections Research, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada

Barbara Armstrong

St. Lawrence Valley Correctional and Treatment Centre

The principles of risk, need, and responsivity have been empirically linked to the effectiveness of treatment to reduce reoffending, but the transference of these principles to the inside of prison walls is difficult. Results from a sample of 620 incarcerated male offenders—482 who received either a 5-week, 10-week, or 15-week prison-based treatment program and 138 untreated comparison offenders—found that treatment significantly reduced recidivism (odds ratio of .56; effect size r of .10) and that the amount of treatment (e.g., "dosage") played a significant role (odds ratios between .92 and .95 per week of treatment; adjusted effect size r of .01 and .02). These results indicate that prison-based treatment can be effective in reducing recidivism, that dosage plays a mediating role, and that there may be minimum levels of treatment required to reduce recidivism that is dependent on the level of an offender’s risk and need.

Key Words: recidivism • treatment • dosage • cognitive-behavioral • prison

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 32, No. 1, 3-25 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854804270618


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Gendreau, P. Smith, and Y. L. Theriault Chaos Theory and Correctional Treatment: Common Sense, Correctional Quackery, and the Law of Fartcatchers Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, November 1, 2009; 25(4): 384 - 396. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. K. Hanson, G. Bourgon, L. Helmus, and S. Hodgson The Principles of Effective Correctional Treatment Also Apply To Sexual Offenders: A Meta-Analysis Criminal Justice and Behavior, September 1, 2009; 36(9): 865 - 891. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. C. Serin, R. Gobeil, and D. L. Preston Evaluation of the Persistently Violent Offender Treatment Program Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, February 1, 2009; 53(1): 57 - 73. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. De Wree, T. Vander Beken, and G. Vermeulen The transfer of sentenced persons in Europe: Much ado about reintegration Punishment Society, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 111 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. K. Parhar, J. S. Wormith, D. M. Derkzen, and A. M. Beauregard Offender Coercion in Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness Criminal Justice and Behavior, September 1, 2008; 35(9): 1109 - 1135. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. R. Magaletta, R. D. Morgan, L. R. Reitzel, and C. A. Innes Toward the One: Strengthening Behavioral Sciences Research in Corrections Criminal Justice and Behavior, July 1, 2007; 34(7): 933 - 944. [Abstract] [PDF]