Criminal Justice and Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Vandecreek, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 33, No. 4, 542-564 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854806287352

Ethical Decision Making for Correctional Mental Health Providers

Ron Bonner

Federal Correctional Institution-Allenwood

Leon D. Vandecreek

Wright State University

Clinicians who practice correctional mental health care face a number of unique ethical challenges as the result of the correctional environment. Each mental health care profession has a code of ethics to help guide clinicians in practice, but correctional mental health clinicians have sometimes concluded that the ethics codes of their associations provide insufficient guidance for their unique challenges. The American Correctional Health Services Association and the American Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology have developed codes of ethics, which provide mental health care providers a well-balanced, clinician-derived guide for ethical clinical practice in corrections. These specialized codes complement existing general ethical principles in decision making for correctional mental health providers. The major principles of welfare of the client, informed consent, competence, dual relationships, confidentiality, and social responsibility are reviewed, and case examples are provided to illustrate the ethical decision-making process.

Key Words: ethical decision making • correctional mental health care • code of ethics • confidentiality • dual role conflict


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
K. Adams and J. Ferrandino
Managing Mentally Ill Inmates in Prisons
Criminal Justice and Behavior, August 1, 2008; 35(8): 913 - 927.
[Abstract] [PDF]