This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cloyes, K. G. Articles by Rhodes, L. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Assessment of Psychosocial Impairment in a Supermaximum Security Unit Sample

University of Utah, kristin.cloyes{at}nurs.utah.edu

David Lovell

University of Washington

David G. Allen

University of Washington

Lorna A. Rhodes

University of Washington

This article concerns a study of Washington State supermaximum security unit (SMU) residents conducted to generate systematic, empirical data for this population and to investigate behavioral, institutional, and policy issues that affect their treatment. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) is used to standardize interview-based assessments of participants’ psychosocial functioning, in conjunction with other operational, situation-specific measures. Results indicate that the BPRS is a reliable and effective measure of psychosocial impairment in SMU residents. Comparison of factor-based BPRS scores in this sample with scores and factor analysis solutions achieved in other populations points to considerations specific to this population that require further study. Finally, assessment of SMU residents using the BPRS and convergent measures of impairment indicates that a significant number demonstrate psychosocial impairment and/or meet criteria for serious mental illness.

Key Words: supermaximum security • prison • mental illness • mental health • Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Haney A Culture of Harm: Taming the Dynamics of Cruelty in Supermax Prisons Criminal Justice and Behavior, August 1, 2008; 35(8): 956 - 984. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Lovell Patterns of Disturbed Behavior in a Supermax Population Criminal Justice and Behavior, August 1, 2008; 35(8): 985 - 1004. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Pizarro and R. E. Narag Supermax Prisons: What We Know, What We Do Not Know, and Where We Are Going The Prison Journal, March 1, 2008; 88(1): 23 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. P. Mears An Assessment of Supermax Prisons Using an Evaluation Research Framework The Prison Journal, March 1, 2008; 88(1): 43 - 68. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. L. O'Keefe Administrative Segregation From Within: A Corrections Perspective The Prison Journal, March 1, 2008; 88(1): 123 - 143. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Lovell, L. C. Johnson, and K. C. Cain Recidivism of Supermax Prisoners in Washington State Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2007; 53(4): 633 - 656. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. B. Clements, R. Althouse, R. K. Ax, P. R. Magaletta, T. J. Fagan, and J. S. Wormith Systemic Issues and Correctional Outcomes: Expanding the Scope of Correctional Psychology Criminal Justice and Behavior, July 1, 2007; 34(7): 919 - 932. [Abstract] [PDF]