Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0093854806294147v1
34/4/555    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brough, P.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Managing Occupational Stress in a High-Risk Industry

Measuring the Job Demands of Correctional Officers

Paula Brough

Shool of Psychology, Griffith University, Australia, P.Brough{at}griffith.edu.au

Joanne Williams

Griffith University, Australia

Occupational stress is an increasing health problem for the high-risk industries. The occupation of correctional officers has received relatively scant attention, contributing to a recent increase in formal occupational stress claims. This research evaluates the ability of the Job Demand-Control-Support (JDCS) model to predict strain in 132 Australian correctional officers. A specific measure of job demands predicts the psychological outcome (job satisfaction) to a greater extent than the generic (JDCS) demands measure. The ability of supervisor support to moderate the consequences of these job demands is also demonstrated and has implications for the training of correctional supervisors. Arguments for including sample-specific measures of job demands are discussed.

Key Words: correctional officers • job demands • job satisfaction • supervisor support • psychological well-being

This version was published on April 1, 2007

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 34, No. 4, 555-567 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854806294147


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Correct Health CareHome page
D. X. Swenson, D. Waseleski, and R. Hartl
Shift Work and Correctional Officers: Effects and Strategies for Adjustment
Journal of Correctional Health Care, October 1, 2008; 14(4): 299 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]