Criminal Justice and Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sacks, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zlotnick, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 34, No. 9, 1198-1215 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854807304430
© 2007 International Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology

CJDATS Co-Occurring Disorders Screening Instrument for Mental Disorders

A Validation Study

Stanley Sacks

Center for the Integration of Research & Practice, National Development & Research Institutes, Inc.

Gerald Melnick

Center for the Integration of Research & Practice, National Development & Research Institutes, Inc.

Carrie Coen

Center for the Integration of Research & Practice, National Development & Research Institutes, Inc.

Steve Banks

University of Massachusetts Medical School

Peter D. Friedmann

Brown University Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Christine Grella

University of California, Los Angeles

Kevin Knight

Texas Christian University

Caron Zlotnick

Brown Medical School, Butler Hospital

Three standardized screening instruments—the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Short Screener, the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview—Modified, and the Mental Health Screening Form (MHSF)—were compared to two shorter instruments, the 6-item Co-Occurring Disorders Screening Instrument for Mental Disorders (CODSI-MD) and the 3-item CODSI for Severe Mental Disorders (CODSI-SMD) for use with offenders in prison substance abuse treatment programs. Results showed that the CODSI screening instruments were comparable to the longer instruments in overall accuracy and that all of the instruments performed reasonably well. The CODSI instruments showed sufficient value to justify their use in prison substance abuse treatment programs and to warrant validation testing in other criminal justice populations and settings.

Key Words: co-occurring disorders • criminal justice • mental disorders • substance abuse • screening • instrument


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
D. D. Simpson and K. Knight
Offender Needs and Functioning Assessments From a National Cooperative Research Program
Criminal Justice and Behavior, September 1, 2007; 34(9): 1105 - 1112.
[PDF]