Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perelman, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Clements, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Beliefs About What Works in Juvenile Rehabilitation

The Influence of Attitudes on Support for "Get Tough" and Evidence-Based Interventions

Abigayl M. Perelman

University of Alabama, amperelman{at}bama.ua.edu

Carl B. Clements

University of Alabama

Throughout the past half century, public sentiment about sentencing of offenders has vacillated between rehabilitative and punitive goals. Whether these shifting positions are influenced by actual knowledge regarding program effectiveness or merely reflect underlying attitudes is unknown. The current study used an online survey to examine college students' (N = 130) judgments about the effectiveness of different interventions for juvenile offenders. Results indicated that participants rated three popular but empirically unsupported (get tough) programs as being equally effective as four empirically validated treatments. However, personal attitudes were a strong moderator of program effectiveness ratings. For example, those endorsing rehabilitative goals were more likely to rate empirically supported interventions as effective. A punishment orientation was associated with endorsement of get tough programs. Possible follow-up studies include evaluating the connection between attitudes and program effectiveness knowledge, examining the impact of educational interventions, and conducting replications with justice professionals and community leaders.

Key Words: rehabilitation • punitive strategies • public attitudes • evidence-based treatment

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 36, No. 2, 184-197 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0093854808328122
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?