Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farrington, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Letter

Stealing From a "Lost" Letter

Effects of Victim Characteristics

David P. Farrington

Institute of Criminology, Cambridge University

Barry J. Knight

Institute of Criminology, Cambridge University

A nonreactive field experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of the victim on stealing. The subjects were 160 people in the streets of London, England, who picked up a stamped, addressed, unsealed, apparently lost letter containing a handwritten note and (except in control conditions) also £1 in cash. The content of the note made it appear that the possible victim of stealing was male or female, old or young, rich or poor, an individual or an association. It was found that subjects were more likely to steal from males than from females, but stealing was not significantly influenced by the other independent variables. Subjects who were younger or more casually dressed were more likely to steal than others. Stealing did not vary with the subject's sex. It was concluded that stealing depended partly on the individual and partly on situational factors.

Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 7, No. 4, 423-436 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/009385488000700406


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?