Criminal Justice and Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Randolph, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 8, No. 4, 471-481 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/009385488100800405

The Competency Screening Test

A Replication and Extension

John J. Randolph

Chester Mental Health Center Chester, Illinois

Terry Hicks

Chester Mental Health Center Chester, Illinois

David Mason

Chester Mental Health Center Chester, Illinois

The Competency Screening Test was administered to a group of patient/defendants to study its interscorer reliability and its predictive validity of fitness to stand trial based on psychiatric opinion. The interscorer reliabilities were high. The test also significantly differentiated between patients categorized by the participating psychiatrist as fit and those categorized as not fit. The results compared favorably in terms of overall accuracy with those published earlier. An analysis of false positives and false negatives suggested some possible differences in the kinds of predictive errors inherent in the two sets of data. The desirability of the latter approach was pointed out. The data support the conclusion that this instrument may be useful as a screening tool for referral of patient/defendants by a nonpsychiatric member of the treatment team for competency evaluation by a psychiatric member of that team.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
C. EVERINGTON and C. DUNN
A Second Validation Study of the Competence Assessment for Standing Trial for Defendants with Mental Retardation (CAST-MR)
Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 1995; 22(1): 44 - 59.
[Abstract]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
C. T. EVERINGTON
The Competence Assessment for Standing Trial for Defendants with Mental Retardation (Cast-MR): A Validation Study
Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 1990; 17(2): 147 - 168.
[Abstract]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
J. J. RANDOLPH, T. HICKS, D. MASON, and D. J. CUNEO
The Competency Screening Test: A Validation Study in Cook County, Illinois
Criminal Justice and Behavior, December 1, 1982; 9(4): 495 - 500.
[Abstract]