Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0093854808320922v1
35/12/1459    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walters, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Self-Report Measures of Psychopathy, Antisocial Personality, and Criminal Lifestyle: Testing and Validating a Two-Dimensional Model

Glenn D. Walters, Ph.D.*

Federal Correctional Institution, Schuylkill, Pennsylvania

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gwalters{at}bop.gov.


   Abstract
This article reports results from five studies. Exploratory factor analysis was used to select indicators from the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles, Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy scales, and Personality Assessment Inventory–Antisocial Features Scale. The 10 indicators were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis, the results of which show that the two-dimensional model (proactive, reactive) achieves significantly better fit than a general one-factor model and a two-factor social learning model (criminal thinking, antisocial behavior) with 521 medium-security and 116 maximum-security inmates. The construct validity of the two-dimensional model is confirmed in a path analysis pairing (a) proactive scales with positive outcome expectancies for crime and (b) reactive scales with hostile attribution biases. Implications for a unified theory of aggression and criminality are discussed.

First published on September 10, 2008, doi:10.1177/0093854808320922

Criminal Justice and Behavior 2008;35:1459.

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
G. D. Walters, A. Deming, and W. N. Elliott
Assessing Criminal Thinking in Male Sex Offenders With the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles
Criminal Justice and Behavior, October 1, 2009; 36(10): 1025 - 1036.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
V. M. Gonsalves, M. J. Scalora, and M. T. Huss
Prediction of Recidivism Using the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised and the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles Within a Forensic Sample
Criminal Justice and Behavior, July 1, 2009; 36(7): 741 - 756.
[Abstract] [PDF]